The articles that are being published in the „Revista de turism" journal are peer-reviewed by experts. Our journal's reputation depends on publishing the best manuscripts realized in the scientific domain, which can be achieved through a process of good quality review and finalized on time.

After the first review of the manuscript by the editors, it is send to two reviewers/experts. The reviewers/experts fill in the checklist (A) and send their suggestions to the authors (B) and their recommendations to the editors (C).

A. Checklist

B. Suggestions for the authors

Please argue the way you have noted the paper in the previous section. If you demand to modify the material, please offer the authors the precise indications regarding what should be modified or completed and how, be precise whether the recommendations are optional or compulsory. Also, please add any other recommendations you consider necessary for improving the paper's quality.

The offered suggestions will be included within the word folder that contains the reviewed material realized with the add of the menu bar:

-For WORD 2003 version - Insert>Comment.

-For WORD 2007 version - Reviewing> Comment.

C. Recommendation for the editors

After the paper reviewing, your final recommendation to the authors is:

( ) Publishing of the article in the initial shape, without any changes.

( ) Publishing the article with the minimum adjusting.

( ) Publishing the article in the reviewed form, taking into account the reviewer's recommendation.

( ) Not publishing the article.

 [1] Please tick with x the space between the brackets, corresponding to the reviewer option.